Statistical Models and Empirical Evidence for Differences in the Motherhood Penalty across the Earnings Distribution
- 31 March 2014
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Sociological Review
- Vol. 79 (2) , 358-364
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Motherhood Penalty Larger for Low-Wage Women? A Comment on Quantile RegressionAmerican Sociological Review, 2014
- HIGHLIGHTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDITIONAL AND UNCONDITIONAL QUANTILE REGRESSION APPROACHES THROUGH AN APPLICATION TO ASSESS MEDICATION ADHERENCEHealth Economics, 2013
- Who Gets the Daddy Bonus?Gender & Society, 2010
- Differences in DisadvantageAmerican Sociological Review, 2010
- Unconditional Quantile RegressionsEconometrica, 2009
- Her money, her time: Women’s earnings and their housework hoursSocial Science Research, 2006
- ?The Motherhood Wage Gap for Women in the United States: The Importance of College and Fertility Delay?Review of Economics of the Household, 2005
- The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort, and Work-Schedule FlexibilityILR Review, 2003