An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants
Authors:
- Christine GradyCGChristine Grady
- Neal DickertNDNeal Dickert
- Tom JawetzTJTom Jawetz
- Gary GenslerGGGary Gensler
- Ezekiel EmanuelEEEzekiel Emanuel
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 26 (3) , 365-375
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Payment of Research Subjects Involved in Clinical Trials is UnethicalJournal of Neuro-Oncology, 2003
- Paying Research Subjects: An Analysis of Current PoliciesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Justice for the Professional Guinea PigThe American Journal of Bioethics, 2001
- Money for Research Participation: Does It Jeopardize Informed Consent?The American Journal of Bioethics, 2001
- Guinea Pigs on the payroll: The ethics of paying research subjectsAccountability in Research, 1999
- What's the Price of a Research Subject? Approaches to Payment for Research ParticipationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Paying People to Participate in Research: Why not?Bioethics, 1997
- False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic MisconceptionHastings Center Report, 1987
- 'Due' and 'Undue' Inducements: On Pasing Money to Research SubjectsIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 1981