Potential bias in studies of accidental needle sticks
Authors:
- Javed SheikhJSJaved Sheikh
- Kazim SheikhKSKazim Sheikh
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
- Vol. 100 (4) , 389-391
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- SAFETY NEEDLESAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2008
- ARE SAFETY NEEDLES SAFER THAN TRADITIONAL NEEDLES?Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2007
- Accidental needle sticks, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the fallacy of public policyAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2006
- Needlestick Injuries in the United States: Epidemiologic, Economic, and Quality of Life IssuesAAOHN Journal, 2005
- Bias: Table 1Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Needle sticks and adverse outcomes in office-based allergy practicesAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2003
- Report of the Council on Scientific AffairsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
- The effect of nonresponse on estimation of relative risk in a case-control studyAnnals of Epidemiology, 1997
- Bias in analytic researchJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979
- DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS AND NON-RESPONDENTS IN A POPULATION-BASED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1978