Is intravenous lorazepam really more effective and safe than intravenous diazepam as first-line treatment for convulsive status epilepticus? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 1 November 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Epilepsy & Behavior
- Vol. 64, 29-36
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Lorazepam in Pediatric Patients with and without Status EpilepticusThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2012
- Intramuscular versus Intravenous Therapy for Prehospital Status EpilepticusNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- The drug treatment of status epilepticus in Europe: Consensus document from a workshop at the first London Colloquium on Status EpilepticusEpilepsia, 2008
- Treatment of Status Epilepticus in Adults: Guidelines of the Italian League Against EpilepsyEpilepsia, 2006
- How Long Do Most Seizures Last? A Systematic Comparison of Seizures Recorded in the Epilepsy Monitoring UnitEpilepsia, 2006
- Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentationJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- LORAZEPAM VERSUS DIAZEPAM IN THE ACUTE TREATMENT OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES AND STATUS EPILEPTICUSDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 1995
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Tissue Distribution of Diazepam and Its Metabolite Desmethyldiazepam: A Human Autopsy StudyThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1985