Better evidence about wicked issues in tackling health inequities
Open Access
- 28 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 31 (3) , 453-456
Abstract
The need for better evidence continues to be emphasized by both researchers and users of research. ‘Better evidence for a better world’ was the theme of this year's Campbell Colloquium for example, a gathering of researchers and policy-makers who aim to systematically build the evidence on the effectiveness of social policies and programs, including those aimed at improving social welfare, reducing crime and improving educational outcomes. This resonates with continuing political interest in making policies more evidence informed. In keeping with this spirit of evidence-based enquiry, it is reasonable to consider what ‘better evidence’ might look like.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is health equity considered in systematic reviews of the cochrane musculoskeletal group?Arthritis Care & Research, 2008
- Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmesBMJ, 2007
- Cochrane and Campbell Collaborations, and health equityThe Lancet, 2006
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Use of research to inform public policymakingThe Lancet, 2004
- The challenges of systematically reviewing public health interventionsJournal of Public Health, 2004
- Good intentions and received wisdom are not enoughJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- Dilemmas in a general theory of planningPolicy Sciences, 1973