Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
Open Access
- 21 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-12
Abstract
Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creation with stakeholders has been proposed as a suitable strategy to tackle wicked problems, yet little information and no clear step-by-step guide exist on how to do this. The objectives of this study were to develop a guideline to assist developers in tackling wicked problems using co-creation with stakeholders, and to apply this guideline to practice with an example case in the field of infection prevention and control. A mixed-method approach consisting of the integration of both quantitative and qualitative research was used. Relevant stakeholders from the veterinary, human health, and public health sectors were identified using a literature scan, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling. The stakeholder salience approach was used to select key stakeholders based on 3 attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Key values of stakeholders (N = 20) were derived by qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitatively weighted and prioritized using an online survey. Our method showed that stakeholder identification and analysis are prerequisites for understanding the complex stakeholder network that characterizes wicked problems. A total of 73 stakeholders were identified of which 36 were selected as potential key stakeholders, and only one was seen as a definite stakeholder. In addition, deriving key stakeholder values is a necessity to gain insights into different problem definitions, solutions and needs stakeholders have regarding the wicked problem. Based on the methods used, we developed a step-by-step guideline for co-creation with stakeholders when tackling wicked problems. The mixed-methods guideline presented here provides a systematic, transparent method to identify, analyze, and co-create with stakeholders, and to recognize and prioritize their values, problem definitions, and solutions in the context of wicked problems. This guideline consists of a general framework and although it was applied in an eHealth context, may be relevant outside of eHealth as well.Keywords
Funding Information
- ZonMw (522001006)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Designing eHealth that Matters via a Multidisciplinary Requirements Development ApproachJMIR Research Protocols, 2013
- Tackling 'wicked' health promotion problems: a New Zealand case studyHealth Promotion International, 2012
- Emerging Zoonoses: the “One Health Approach”Safety and Health at Work, 2012
- A Stakeholder-Informed Approach to the Identification of Criteria for the Prioritization of Zoonoses in CanadaPLOS ONE, 2012
- Why Business Modeling is Crucial in the Development of eHealth TechnologiesJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2011
- A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth TechnologiesJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2011
- Global trends in emerging infectious diseasesNature, 2008
- Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey ServicesJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review, 1997