How to Explain Oppression
Author:
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Philosophy of the Social Sciences
- Vol. 35 (1) , 20-49
Abstract
This article discusses explanatory theories of normative concepts and argues for a set of criteria of adequacy by which such theories may be evaluated. The criteria offered fall into four categories: ontological, theoretical, pragmatic, and moral. After defending the criteria and discussing their relative weighting, this article uses them to prune the set of available explanatory theories of oppression. Functionalist theories, including Hegelian recognition theory and Foucauldian social theory, are rejected, as are psychoanalytic theory and social dominance theory. Finally, the article defends structural rational choice theory as the most promising methodology for explaining oppression.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symposium on explanations and social ontology 2: explanatory ecumenism and economics imperialismEconomics and Philosophy, 2002
- Science, Truth, and Democracy2001
- Social Dominance1999
- Ethical Considerations in Anthropology and Archaeology, or Relativism and Justice for AllJournal of Anthropological Research, 1997
- OPPRESSION BY CHOICEJournal of Social Philosophy, 1994
- Rational Choice and Social TheoryThe Journal of Philosophy, 1994
- In Defense of Explanatory EcumenismEconomics and Philosophy, 1992
- Sour Grapes1983
- Valuation and Objectivity in Science1983
- The Scientific Image1980