Mode of first delivery and severe maternal complications in the subsequent pregnancy
Authors:
- Lotte B. ColmornLCLotte B. Colmorn
- Lone KrebsLKLone Krebs
- Kari KlungsøyrKKKari Klungsøyr
- Maija JakobssonMJMaija Jakobsson
- Anna-Maija TapperATAnna-Maija Tapper
- Mika GisslerMGMika Gissler
- Pelle G. LindqvistPLPelle G. Lindqvist
- Karin KällenKKKarin Källen
- Ragnheiður I. BjarnadóttirRBRagnheiður I. Bjarnadóttir
- Jens Langhoff-RoosJLJens Langhoff-Roos
- 3 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 96 (9) , 1053-1062
Abstract
Introduction Severe obstetric complications increase with the number of previous cesarean deliveries. In the Nordic countries most women have two children. We present the risk of severe obstetric complications at the delivery following a first elective or emergency cesarean and the risk by intended mode of second delivery. Material and methods A two‐year population‐based data collection of severe maternal complications in women with two deliveries in the Nordic countries (n = 213 518). Denominators were retrieved from the national medical birth registers. Results Of 35 450 first cesarean deliveries (17%), 75% were emergency and 25% elective. Severe complications at second delivery were more frequent in women with a first cesarean than with a first vaginal delivery, and rates of abnormally invasive placenta, uterine rupture and severe postpartum hemorrhage were higher after a first elective than after a first emergency cesarean delivery [relative risk (RR) 4.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.0–8.1; RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.5; RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5–3.5, respectively]. A first cesarean was associated with up to 97% of severe complications in the second pregnancy. Induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture and severe hemorrhage. Conclusion Elective repeat cesarean can prevent complete uterine rupture at the second delivery, whereas the risk of severe obstetric hemorrhage, abnormally invasive placenta and peripartum hysterectomy is unchanged by the intended mode of second delivery in women with a first cesarean. Women with a first elective vs. an emergency cesarean have an increased risk of severe complications in the second pregnancy.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean”? A trend analysis in SwitzerlandArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016
- The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014PLOS ONE, 2016
- Morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in the United States: is placenta accreta an increasingly important contributor?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015
- The Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study: a study of complete uterine rupture, abnormally invasive placenta, peripartum hysterectomy, and severe blood loss at deliveryActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2015
- Implications of the First Cesarean: Perinatal and Future Reproductive Health and Subsequent Cesareans, Placentation Issues, Uterine Rupture Risk, Morbidity, and MortalitySeminars in Perinatology, 2012
- Vaginal Birth After Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009
- Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent PregnanciesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at termCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2007
- Maternal Morbidity Associated With Vaginal Versus Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004