Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
Open Access
- 13 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (5) , e0268473
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown that the anesthetic technique may influence long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. However, the association between the anesthetic technique and long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to address this gap. Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent elective oral cancer surgery between January 2014 and December 2015. The patients were grouped based on the anesthesia maintenance: either propofol or sevoflurane. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was performed to deal with the potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to compare hazard ratios (HRs) and identify the risk factors for death and recurrence. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and survival curves were constructed from the date of surgery to death. Results: In total, 1347 patients were eligible for analysis, with 343 and 1004 patients in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 302 patients remained in each group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated the 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 59.3% and 56.0% and 62.7% and 56.5% in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival or recurrence-free survival between the groups. The multivariate Cox analysis verified this conclusion with HRs of 1.10 and 1.11 for overall survival and recurrence-free survival, respectively, in the sevoflurane group. Older age, advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III were associated with poor overall survival. Patients with advanced TNM stage and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma had a higher recurrence risk than their counterparts. Conclusion: The overall and recurrence-free survival rates were similar between propofol-based intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane volatile anesthesia in patients who underwent oral cancer surgery.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Isoflurane, a Commonly Used Volatile Anesthetic, Enhances Renal Cancer Growth and Malignant Potential via the Hypoxia-inducible Factor Cellular Signaling Pathway In VitroAnesthesiology, 2013
- Cancer statistics, 2013CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2013
- Free flap reconstruction in patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of patient survival and cancer recurrenceMicrosurgery, 2012
- Volatile Anesthetics Reduce Invasion of Colorectal Cancer Cells through Down-regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9Anesthesiology, 2012
- Sevoflurane inhibits invasion and migration of lung cancer cells by inactivating the p38 MAPK signaling pathwayJournal of Anesthesia, 2012
- Differential effects of propofol and isoflurane on the activation of T‐helper cells in lung cancer patientsAnaesthesia, 2010
- Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancerOral Oncology, 2009
- HIF-1α determines the metastatic potential of gastric cancer cellsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Prognostic impact of blood transfusion in patients undergoing primary surgery and free‐flap reconstruction for oral squamous cell carcinomaCancer, 2009
- Inhibition of Interferon Stimulation of Natural Killer Cell Activity in Mice Anesthetized with Halothane or IsofluraneAnesthesiology, 1993