Abstract
Benign termination, in which magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities deconfine runaway electrons (REs) following hydrogenic injections, is a promising strategy for mitigating dangerous RE loads after disruptions. Recent experiments on the Joint European Torus (JET) have explored this scenario at higher pre-disruptive plasma currents than are achievable on other devices, revealing challenges in obtaining benign terminations at I p ⩾ 2.5 MA. This work analyzes the evolution of these high-current RE beams and their terminating MHD events using fast magnetic sensor measurements and EFIT equilibrium reconstructions for approximately 40 JET and 20 DIII-D tokamak discharges. On JET, unsuccessful non-benign terminations occur at low edge safety factor ( q edge ≈ 2 ), and are preceded by intermittent, non-terminating MHD events at higher rational q edge . Trends in the internal inductance l i indicate more peaked RE current profiles in the high- I p non-benign population, which may hinder successful recombination through re-ionization of the companion plasma. In contrast, benign terminations on JET typically occur at higher q edge ⩾ 3 and exhibit less peaked RE current profiles. DIII-D displays a broader range of terminating edge safety factors, again correlated with the measured l i values. Across both tokamaks, the RE current peaking is therefore found to determine which MHD instability boundary is encountered, a result confirmed by linear resistive MHD modeling with the CASTOR3D code. Measured growth rates are similar for benign and non-benign cases, indicating that ideal MHD timescales at low density after hydrogenic injection do not alone explain efficient RE deconfinement. Instead, non-benign cases are most readily characterized by their comparably lower overall MHD perturbation amplitudes δ B . These observations suggest that the interplay between ideal and resistive dynamics governs the termination process, with implications for extrapolating benign RE termination to high- I p reactor scenarios.
Funding Information
  • Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation
  • U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, using the DIII-D National Fusion Facility, a DOE Office of Science User Facility (DE-FC02-04ER54698)
  • EUROfusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200 EUROfusion)

This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit: