Structured reporting of x-rays for atraumatic shoulder pain: advantages over free text?
Authors:
- Franziska SchöppeFSFranziska Schöppe
- Wieland H. SommerWSWieland H. Sommer
- Florian SchmidutzFSFlorian Schmidutz
- Dominik PförringerDPDominik Pförringer
- Marco ArmbrusterMAMarco Armbruster
- Karolin J. PaprottkaKPKarolin J. Paprottka
- Jessica L. V. PlumJPJessica L. V. Plum
- Bastian O. SabelBSBastian O. Sabel
- Felix G. MeinelFMFelix G. Meinel
- Nora N. SommerNSNora N. Sommer
Open Access
- 3 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Imaging
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
To analyse structured and free text reports of shoulder X-ray examinations evaluating the quality of reports and potential contributions to clinical decision-making. We acquired both standard free text and structured reports of 31 patients with a painful shoulder without history of previous trauma who received X-ray exams. A template was created for the structured report based on the template ID 0000154 (Shoulder X-ray) from radreport.org using online software with clickable decision trees with concomitant generation of structured semantic reports. All reports were evaluated regarding overall quality and key features: content, information extraction and clinical relevance. Two experienced orthopaedic surgeons reviewed and rated structured and free text reports of 31 patients independently. The structured reports achieved significantly higher median ratings in all key features evaluated (P < 0.001), including facilitation of information extraction (P < 0.001) and better contribution to subsequent clinical decision-making (P < 0.001). The overall quality of structured reports was significantly higher than in free text report (P < 0.001). A comprehensive structured template may be a useful tool to assist in clinical decision-making and is, thus, recommended for the reporting of degenerative changes regarding X-ray examinations of the shoulder.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Structured Reporting Web Tool for Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsJMIR Research Protocols, 2013
- Structured reporting: if, why, when, how—and at what expense? Results of a focus group meeting of radiology professionals from eight countriesInsights into Imaging, 2012
- Improving Communication of Diagnostic Radiology Findings through Structured ReportingRadiology, 2011
- Optimizing Technology Development and Adoption in Medical Imaging Using the Principles of Innovation Diffusion, Part I: Theoretical, Historical, and Contemporary ConsiderationsJournal of Digital Imaging, 2011
- Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR)Insights into Imaging, 2011
- Radiological Reports: A Comparison between the Transmission Efficiency of Information in Free Text and in Structured ReportsClinics, 2010
- The Radiology Report of the Future: A Summary of the 2007 Intersociety ConferenceJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2008
- Quality—A Radiology Imperative: Report of the 2006 Intersociety ConferenceJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2007
- The checklist—a tool for error management and performance improvementJournal of Critical Care, 2006
- Radiological Assessment of Osteo-ArthrosisAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1957