Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants
Authors:
- William Tarnow-MordiWTWilliam Tarnow-Mordi
- Jonathan MorrisJMJonathan Morris
- Adrienne KirbyAKAdrienne Kirby
- Kristy RobledoKRKristy Robledo
- Lisa AskieLALisa Askie
- Rebecca BrownRBRebecca Brown
- Nicholas EvansNENicholas Evans
- Sarah FinlaysonSFSarah Finlayson
- Michael FogartyMFMichael Fogarty
- Val GebskiVGVal Gebski
- Alpana GhadgeAGAlpana Ghadge
- Wendy HagueWHWendy Hague
Top Cited Papers
- 21 December 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 377 (25) , 2445-2455
Abstract
The preferred timing of umbilical-cord clamping in preterm infants is unclear. We randomly assigned fetuses from women who were expected to deliver before 30 weeks of gestation to either immediate clamping of the umbilical cord (≤10 seconds after delivery) or delayed clamping (≥60 seconds after delivery). The primary composite outcome was death or major morbidity (defined as severe brain injury on postnatal ultrasonography, severe retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or late-onset sepsis) by 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, accounting for multiple births. Of 1634 fetuses that underwent randomization, 1566 were born alive before 30 weeks of gestation; of these, 782 were assigned to immediate cord clamping and 784 to delayed cord clamping. The median time between delivery and cord clamping was 5 seconds and 60 seconds in the respective groups. Complete data on the primary outcome were available for 1497 infants (95.6%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome between infants assigned to delayed clamping (37.0%) and those assigned to immediate clamping (37.2%) (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.13; P=0.96). The mortality was 6.4% in the delayed-clamping group and 9.0% in the immediate-clamping group (P=0.03 in unadjusted analyses; P=0.39 after post hoc adjustment for multiple secondary outcomes). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidences of chronic lung disease or other major morbidities. Among preterm infants, delayed cord clamping did not result in a lower incidence of the combined outcome of death or major morbidity at 36 weeks of gestation than immediate cord clamping. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC] and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre; APTS Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12610000633088.)Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Apgar Score and Infant MortalityPLOS ONE, 2013
- European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants - 2013 UpdateNeonatology, 2013
- Prediction of Mortality in Very Premature Infants: A Systematic Review of Prediction ModelsPLOS ONE, 2011
- Do differences in delivery room intubation explain different rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia between hospitals?Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2010
- Care during the third stage of labour: A postal survey of UK midwives and obstetriciansBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2010
- Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costsClinical Trials, 2008
- A randomized clinical trial comparing immediate versus delayed clamping of the umbilical cord in preterm infants: short‐term clinical and laboratory endpointsTransfusion, 2008
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Brief Delay in Clamping the Umbilical Cord of Preterm InfantsNeonatology, 2007
- A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job wellThe Lancet, 2005
- Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatmentBritish Journal of Radiology, 1971