Interactions of DNA repair gene variants modulate chromosomal aberrations in healthy subjects
Open Access
- 8 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Carcinogenesis
- Vol. 36 (11) , 1299-1306
Abstract
Human cancers are often associated with numerical and structural chromosomal instability. Structural chromosomal aberrations (CAs) in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) arise as consequences of direct DNA damage or due to replication on a damaged DNA template. In both cases, DNA repair is critical and inter-individual differences in its capacity are probably due to corresponding genetic variations. We investigated functional variants in DNA repair genes (base and nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair) in relation to CAs, chromatid-type aberrations (CTAs) and chromosome-type aberrations (CSAs) in healthy individuals. Chromosomal damage was determined by conventional cytogenetic analysis. The genotyping was performed by both restriction fragment length polymorphism and TaqMan allelic discrimination assays. Multivariate logistic regression was applied for testing individual factors on CAs, CTAs and CSAs. Pair-wise genotype interactions of 11 genes were constructed for all possible pairs of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Analysed individually, we observed significantly lower CTA frequencies in association with XPD Lys751Gln homozygous variant genotype [odds ratio (OR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48–0.85, P = 0.004; n = 1777]. A significant association of heterozygous variant genotype in RAD54L with increased CSA frequency (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.01–4.02, P = 0.03) was determined in 282 subjects with available genotype. By addressing gene–gene interactions, we discovered 14 interactions significantly modulating CAs, 9 CTAs and 12 CSAs frequencies. Highly significant interactions included always pairs from two different pathways. Although individual variants in genes encoding DNA repair proteins modulate CAs only modestly, several gene–gene interactions in DNA repair genes evinced either enhanced or decreased CA frequencies suggesting that CAs accumulation requires complex interplay between different DNA repair pathways.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genomic Instability in CancerCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 2013
- A function for cyclin D1 in DNA repair uncovered by protein interactome analyses in human cancersNature, 2011
- Evaluating the effects of genetic variants of DNA repair genes using cytogenetic mutagen sensitivity approachesBiomarkers, 2011
- Association between Frequency of Chromosomal Aberrations and Cancer Risk Is Not Influenced by Genetic Polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1Environmental Health Perspectives, 2009
- Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer: results from a pooled cohort study of 22 358 subjects in 11 countriesCarcinogenesis, 2008
- DNA‐damage repair; the good, the bad, and the uglyThe EMBO Journal, 2008
- The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causationNature Reviews Cancer, 2007
- Does occupational exposure to mineral fibres cause DNA or chromosome damage?Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2004
- A census of human cancer genesNature Reviews Cancer, 2004
- Markers of individual susceptibility and DNA repair rate in workers exposed to xenobiotics in a tire plantEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2004