Absorbable Polyglactin vs. Non-Cross-linked Porcine Biological Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Infected Incisional Hernia

This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:

• A 5-Year Clinical Experience With Single-Staged Repairs of Infected and Contaminated Abdominal Wall Defects Utilizing Biologic Mesh
  Annals of Surgery, 2013
• Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation
  Surgical Endoscopy, 2013
• Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: The RICH Study
  Surgery, 2012
• Activation of human mononuclear cells by porcine biologic meshes in vitro
  Hernia, 2010
• Major Complications Associated With Xenograft Biologic Mesh Implantation in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
  Surgical Innovation, 2009
• A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
• Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen
  The American Journal of Surgery, 2004
• Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction
  Transplant Immunology, 2004
• Staged Management of Giant Abdominal Wall Defects
  Annals of Surgery, 2003
• Porcine dermal collagen repair of incisional herniae
  British Journal of Surgery, 1984