Comparison of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with Truview PCD TM , McGrath ® and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized prospective study
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medknow in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
- Vol. 19 (1) , 68-75
Abstract
Context: We hypothesized that reduced oropharyngolaryngeal stimulation with video laryngoscopes would attenuate hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Aim: Comparison of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation with video laryngoscopes and Macintosh (MC) laryngoscope. Setting and Design: Superspecialty tertiary care public hospital; prospective, randomized control study. Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomly allocated to three groups of 20 each: MC, McGrath (MG), and Truview (TV). Hemodynamic parameters were serially recorded before and after intubation. Laryngoscopic grade, laryngoscopy, and tracheal intubation time, ST segment changes, and intra-/post-operative complications were also recorded and compared between groups. Statistical Analysis: SPSS version 17 was used, and appropriate tests applied. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Heart rate and diastolic arterial pressure increased at 0 and 1 min of intubation in all the three groups (P < 0.05) while mean arterial pressure increased at 0 min in the MG and TV groups and at 1 min in all three groups (P < 0.05). A significant increase in systolic arterial pressure was only observed in TV group at 1 min (P < 0.05). These hemodynamic parameters returned to baseline by 3 min of intubation in all the groups. The intergroup comparisons of all hemodynamic parameters were not significant at any time of observation. Highest intubation difficulty score was observed with MC (2.16 ± 1.86) as compared with MG (0.55 ± 0.88) and TV (0.42 ± 0.83) groups (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively). However, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation was significantly less in MC (36.68 ± 16.15 s) as compared with MG (75.25 ± 30.94 s) and TV (60.47 ± 27.45 s) groups (P = 0.000 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Video laryngoscopes did not demonstrate any advantage in terms of hemodynamic response in patients with normal airway undergoing CABG.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of Truview EVO2 laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomized crossover clinical trialSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2013
- A randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare Truview blade with Macintosh blade for laryngoscopy and intubation under general anesthesiaJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 2011
- Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus video laryngoscopyIndian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2011
- Video‐laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literatureActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2010
- Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetistsBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009
- Comparison of the Glidescope ® , the McGrath ® , the Airtraq ® and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways*Anaesthesia, 2008
- Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2®, Glidescope®, and Airwayscope® laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilizationBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2008
- An evaluation of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscopeAnaesthesia, 2007
- The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)Anesthesiology, 1997
- CARDIOVASCULAR AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO LARYNGOSCOPY WITH AND WITHOUT TRACHEAL INTUBATIONBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1987