Influence of Immunosuppressive Regimens on Graft Survival and Secondary Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation
Authors:
- Gerhard OpelzGerhard Opelz
- Bernd DöhlerBDBernd Döhler
- Collaborative Transplant StudyCSCollaborative Transplant Study
- 27 March 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 87 (6) , 795-802
Abstract
Background. There have been striking changes during the last 10 years concerning the choice of calcineurin inhibitor and antimetabolite agent prescribed after kidney transplantation. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 51,303 patients undergoing deceased-donor kidney transplantation during 1998 to 2007 was performed using multivariate regression analysis. All patients received cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac) with azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) on an intention-to-treat basis with corticosteroids plus/minus antibody induction. Graft survival rates and secondary outcomes were analyzed. A subanalysis was performed for transplants undertaken during 2002 to 2007, in which all patients were treated with MPA plus corticosteroids and CsA or Tac. Results. All-cause graft failure and death-censored graft failure to 5 years posttransplant did not differ significantly between Tac and CsA. We found no evidence in support of previous claims that MPA results in superior long-term graft survival compared with AZA treatment. At the end of year 1, Tac was associated with a lower risk for serum creatinine more than or equal to 130 μmol/L (PPPPP<0.001) versus AZA. Conclusions. Five-year graft survival in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients is equivalent in patients receiving CsA- or Tac-based immunosuppression, and in those receiving MPA or AZA. The absence of a survival benefit with modern agents is relevant in the current cost-conscious era of prescribing.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduced Exposure to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Azathioprine for Prevention of Chronic Allograft Dysfunction in Renal TransplantationJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2007
- Kidney Transplant Rejection in Australia and New Zealand: Relationships Between Rejection and Graft OutcomeAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2007
- Results of an International, Randomized Trial Comparing Glucose Metabolism Disorders and Outcome with Cyclosporine Versus TacrolimusAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2007
- One-Year Results with Extended-Release Tacrolimus/MMF, Tacrolimus/MMF and Cyclosporine/MMF in De Novo Kidney Transplant RecipientsAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2007
- Immunosuppression: Evolution in Practice and Trends, 1994–2004American Journal of Transplantation, 2006
- Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial dataBMJ, 2005
- Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation (MYSS): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Lack of Improvement in Renal Allograft Survival Despite a Marked Decrease in Acute Rejection Rates Over the Most Recent EraAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2004
- MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1997