An explanation for the presentation-order effect in the method of constant stimuli
Authors:
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 46 (5) , 483-486
Abstract
The point of subjective equality obtained by the method of constant stimuli depends to a great extent on whether the standard (S) or the variable (V) stimulus occurs first. This presentation-order effect was studied using lines as stimuli. Successive S,V pairs were presented, with interstimulus and interpair intervals equal. Observers, who were not told which was S or V, reported whether a given line was longer or shorter than the immediately preceding line. Although the observers'' subjective experience was of a train of lines that was not organized into pairs, the presentation-order effect still occurred. This implies that the effect does not depend on the order of presentation of the stimuli in an experienced pair. It was also shown that the observers could categorize line lengths, since they could identify stochastically the most frequent stimulus (S). We propose that the presentation-order effect depends on a decision process based on response probabilities inferred from length categories.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Different biases in the methods of constant and single stimuliBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1987
- The first five responses in the method of constant stimuli.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1987
- The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing.Psychological Bulletin, 1985
- Time error in lifted weights as affected by presentation order and judgment modePerception & Psychophysics, 1975
- The time-error in comparison judgments.Psychological Bulletin, 1934
- Elemente der PsychophysikThe American Journal of Psychology, 1889