Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an epidemiology Delphi survey
Authors:
- Jennifer Margaret GurneyJGJennifer Margaret Gurney
- Nicolas W MedranoNMNicolas W Medrano
- Smith F HeavnerSHSmith F Heavner
- John B HolcombJHJohn B Holcomb
- Molly P JarmanMJMolly P Jarman
- Colleen M RyanColleen M Ryan
- Carl I SchulmanCSCarl I Schulman
- Jonathan Daniel StallingsJSJonathan Daniel Stallings
- Olga VolkOVOlga Volk
Open Access
- 2 July 2026
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
- Vol. 11 (Suppl 3) , e002095
Abstract
Introduction: To support the development of the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR), a multidisciplinary workgroup used a consensus-driven approach to review established epidemiologic data elements and recommend basic common data elements (CDEs) for inclusion in the NTRR data dictionary. Methods: A 10-member workgroup of military and civilian trauma researchers and data scientists located and reviewed databases, codebooks, data collection forms, and published articles for data elements relevant to trauma epidemiology. Identified data elements were reviewed in a three-round Delphi survey, and monthly meetings with the workgroup were conducted. Consensus during the Delphi survey was analyzed with an 80% agreement threshold. Results: 13 sources were reviewed for epidemiology data elements. After the three survey rounds and workgroup discussions, 33 elements (80%) reached consensus for inclusion, 3 elements (7%) were excluded, and 5 elements (12%) did not reach consensus. Discussion: The Delphi process proved effective in achieving expert consensus on basic CDEs for trauma epidemiologic research. The resulting standardized basic CDEs will improve data harmonization and support consistent data collection in the NTRR. These CDEs represent an initial framework and serve as a foundational starting point for epidemiological data collection within the NTRR. As researchers use the NTRR, the list of CDEs will grow and evolve with the needs of the trauma research community. CDE standardization not only supports interoperable research but also enhances research quality, efficiency, and translation into clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Level VIIKeywords
Funding Information
- Defense Health Agency (HT942523P0014)
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of a Golden Hour Policy on the Morbidity and Mortality of Combat CasualtiesJAMA Surgery, 2016
- Saving Lives on the Battlefield (Part II) - One Year Later: A Joint Theater Trauma System and Joint Trauma System Review of Prehospital Trauma Care in Combined Joint Operations Area-Afghanistan (CJOA-A)Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 2015
- Developing best practices to study trauma outcomes in large databasesJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2014
- Progress in Developing Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury Research: Version Two – The End of the BeginningJournal of Neurotrauma, 2013
- Saving Lives on the Battlefield: A Joint Trauma System Review of Pre-Hospital Trauma Care in Combined Joint Operating Area - Afghanistan (CJOA-A)2013
- Death on the battlefield (2001–2011)Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2012
- An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studiesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage: US and international perspectivesCritical Care, 2005
- The Delphi technique: myths and realitiesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2003
- Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.Health Technology Assessment, 1998