Trends in open abdominal surgery in the United States—Observations from 9,950,759 discharges using the 2009–2013 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) datasets
- 1 August 2017
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 214 (2) , 287-292
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 3-year follow-up outcomesInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016
- Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2015
- Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional herniaHernia, 2015
- Is laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease beneficial in patients with previous primary resection through midline laparotomy? A case-matched studySurgical Endoscopy, 2012
- Incisional hernia in patients at risk: can it be prevented?Hernia, 2011
- National Trends and Outcomes for the Surgical Therapy of Ileocolonic Crohn’s Disease: A Population-Based Analysis of Laparoscopic vs. Open ApproachesJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2009
- Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2009
- Laparoscopic Surgery Is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism Compared With Open SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Comparing Surgical Outcomes in Obese Women Undergoing Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, or Laparotomy With Panniculectomy for the Staging of Uterine MalignancyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-AnalysisAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2006