One Thousand Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomies in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Time to Change the Gold Standard
Authors:
- Clay Cothren BurlewCBClay Cothren Burlew
- Ernest E. MooreEMErnest E. Moore
- James B. HaenelJHJames B. Haenel
- Jeffry L. KashukJKJeffry L. Kashuk
- Walter L. BifflWBWalter L. Biffl
- Carlton C. BarnettCBCarlton C. Barnett
- Jeffrey L. JohnsonJJJeffrey L. Johnson
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 212 (2) , 163-170
Abstract
Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy (BPT) is a cost-effective alternative to open tracheostomy. Small series have consistently documented minimal morbidity, but BPT has yet to be embraced as the standard of care. Because this has been our preferred technique in the surgical ICU for more than 20 years, we reviewed our experience to ascertain its safety. We hypothesize that BPT has acceptably minimal morbidity, even in high-risk patients. Patients undergoing BPT from January 1998 to June 2008 were reviewed. High-risk patients were defined as those with cervical collar or halo, cervical spine injuries, systemic heparinization, positive end-expiratory pressure >10 cm H(2)O or fraction of inspired oxygen > 50%. During the study period, 1,000 patients underwent BPT (74% men; mean ± SEM age 46 ± 0.6 years; 70% trauma). BPT was performed 8.9 ± 0.2 days (mean ± SEM) after admission. Patients remained ventilator dependent for an additional 9.7 ± 0.4 days (mean ± SEM). There were 482 (48%) patients undergoing BPT who were considered high-risk: 1 risk category, 273 patients; 2 risk categories, 139 patients; 3 risk categories, 56 patients; 4 risk categories, 12 patients; 5 risk categories, 2 patients. Complications occurred in 14 (1.4%) patients. Early complications included tracheostomy tube misplacement requiring revision (n = 4), bleeding requiring intervention (n = 2), infection (n = 1), and procedure failure requiring cricothyroidotomy (n = 1). Late complications included persistent stoma requiring operative closure (n = 4) and subglottic stenosis (n = 2). There were 6 complications (1.2%) in normal risk and 8 complications (1.7%) in high-risk patients. There were no deaths related to BPT. BPT in the surgical intensive care unit is a safe procedure, even in high-risk patients. We believe BPT is the new gold standard for patients requiring tracheostomy for mechanical ventilation.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study of 506 Cases of Video-Guided Ciaglia Blue Rhino TracheostomiesJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2010
- Tracheotomy: clinical review and guidelinesEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Comparison of Open Versus Bedside Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Cardiothoracic Surgical Patient: Outcomes and Financial AnalysisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilationBMJ, 2005
- A comparison of percutaneous and operative tracheostomies in intensive care patientsCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1995
- Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: Report of 141 casesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- PERCUTANEOUS TRACHEOSTOMY/GASTROSTOMY IN BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS—A MINIMALLY INVASIVE ALTERNATIVE1992
- Appraisal of percutaneous tracheostomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- A prospective comparison of a percutaneous tracheostomy technique with standard surgical tracheostomyIntensive Care Medicine, 1991
- A New Method for TracheotomyJournal of Neurosurgery, 1955