Perineural Invasion as Worsening Criterion for Salivary Gland Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma
Authors:
- Giulianno Molina de MeloGMGiulianno Molina de Melo
- Giovanni Simoes de MedeirosGMGiovanni Simoes de Medeiros
- Arthur Paredes GattiAGArthur Paredes Gatti
- Luiz Henrique GuilhermeLGLuiz Henrique Guilherme
- Murilo Catafesta das NevesMNMurilo Catafesta das Neves
- Marcello RosanoMRMarcello Rosano
- Fabiano Mesquita CallegariFCFabiano Mesquita Callegari
- Jonathon RussellJRJonathon Russell
- Marcio AbrahaoMAMarcio Abrahao
- Onivaldo CervantesOCOnivaldo Cervantes
Open Access
- 1 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
- Vol. 74 (S3) , 6225-6235
Abstract
Mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MECs) are a form of salivary gland malignancy. They are classified according to histological grade and perineural invasion (PNI). In another cancer subtypes, positive-PNI suggests increased poor prognosis; however, the role of isolated positive-PNI salivary gland MEC can still be better investigated as a risk factor. This study investigated whether isolated PNI is independently associated with poor outcomes. Retrospective study, cohort case-series, single-center hospital from 2009 to 2019. Patient demographics, primary tumor, intervention, and survival data are included. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan–Meier survival curve analyses were used for comparison.The study group consisted of 32 patients (15 PNI-positive tumors, and 17 PNI-negative tumors), all admitted for surgery. Univariate analysis showed differences in grade (p = 0.038), positive margins (p = 0.034), soft tissue invasion (p < 0.001), pathological stage (p = 0.014), recurrence (p = 0.015), distant metastasis (p = 0.015) and MEC related death (p = 0.015). The risk in PNI-positive patients to develop soft tissue invasion and positive surgical margins was OR = 8.57 and OR = 4.88, respectively. Multivariate analysis found age differences (p = 0.038), with OR = 1.08. The Disease Specific Survival (DSS) was worst in the PNI-positive group (log-rank p-value = 0.0011), where the probability of dying occurred in the 12–24 months period (log-rank p-value = 0.002). PNI-positive salivary gland MEC is an independent prognostic factor, with poor DSS, increased locoregional recurrence, close correlation with a more aggressive pattern of the disease, and should be reviewed as a high grade histological criteria. Our findings may imply changes in the clinical approach with a more aggressive attitude in the overall treatment.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients with Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Major Salivary GlandsAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2013
- Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland: Factors affecting outcomeHead & Neck, 2011
- Perineural invasion in cancerCancer, 2009
- Management and Outcome of Patients With Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Major Salivary Gland Origin: A Single Institution's 30‐Year ExperienceThe Laryngoscope, 2008
- Prognostic Significance of p27 and Ki-67 Expression in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Intraoral Minor Salivary GlandLaboratory Investigation, 2001
- Prognostic Factors in Major Salivary Gland CancerThe Laryngoscope, 2001
- Mucoepidermoid CarcinomaAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2001
- Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands: A reappraisal of the influence of tumor differentiation on prognosisJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1991
- Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands: A clinicopathologic study of 46 casesHead & Neck Surgery, 1986
- Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland originThe American Journal of Surgery, 1978