Actual and clinician-predicted IOP-29 scores in a clinical setting
Open Access
- 8 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Psychologist
- p. 1-10
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cross-Cultural Applicability of the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29): A Replication of Akca et al. (2023) Using a Serbian SamplePsychological Injury and Law, 2024
- The Inventory of Problems–29 is a Cross-Culturally Valid Symptom Validity Test: Initial Validation in a Turkish Community SamplePsychological Injury and Law, 2023
- Assessing Negative Response Bias Using Self-Report Measures: New Articles, New IssuesPsychological Injury and Law, 2022
- Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: a Psychometric ReviewPsychological Injury and Law, 2021
- Assessing Negative Response Bias: a Review of the Noncredible Overreporting Scales of the MMPI-2-RF and MMPI-3Psychological Injury and Law, 2021
- The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatientsInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2021
- Beyond Rare-Symptoms Endorsement: a Clinical Comparison Simulation Study Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29)Psychological Injury and Law, 2019
- A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability ResearchJournal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2016
- The Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI): a New Instrument for the Assessment of Distorted Symptom EndorsementPsychological Injury and Law, 2016
- A goodness‐of‐fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: Confidence interval construction, significance‐testing and sample size estimationStatistics in Medicine, 1992