The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined
Authors:
- Brian J. GainesBGBrian J. Gaines
- James H. KuklinskiJKJames H. Kuklinski
- Paul J. QuirkPQPaul J. Quirk
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Political Analysis
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-20
Abstract
Scholars of political behavior increasingly embed experimental designs in opinion surveys by randomly assigning respondents alternative versions of questionnaire items. Such experiments have major advantages: they are simple to implement and they dodge some of the difficulties of making inferences from conventional survey data. But survey experiments are no panacea. We identify problems of inference associated with typical uses of survey experiments in political science and highlight a range of difficulties, some of which have straightforward solutions within the survey-experimental approach and some of which can be dealt with only by exercising greater caution in interpreting findings and bringing to bear alternative strategies of research.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impersonal Influence1998
- Matching As An Econometric Evaluation EstimatorReview of Economic Studies, 1998
- Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training ProgrammeReview of Economic Studies, 1997
- Racial Attitudes and the "New South"The Journal of Politics, 1997
- Public Perceptions of Race and Crime: The Role of Racial StereotypesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1997
- Racial Stereotypes and Whites' Political Views of Blacks in the Context of Welfare and CrimeAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1997
- The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate EvaluationAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society1990
- Making It Count1987
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983