Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repairs: 5 year recurrence rates
- 5 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 22 (9) , 1935-1940
Abstract
Current studies with 2-3 year follow-up favor laparoscopic ventral hernia repair due to lower recurrence rates, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stays. There is scant data in the literature for this group of patients regarding longer follow-up. This study compares the actual 5 year recurrence rates of laparoscopic versus open techniques and determines factors that may affect recurrence. A retrospective analysis of ventral hernia repairs at a tertiary center between January 1996 and December 2001 was performed. In this era, the method of repair often depended on which surgeon evaluated the patient. All patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years (median 7.5 years). Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analyses and the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Of 331 patients, 119 underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LAP), 106 open hernia repair with mesh (O-M), 86 open suture repair (O-S), and 20 laparoscopic converted to open (LCO). Statistical analyses showed equal parameters among groups except defect sizes (mean ± standard error on the mean [SEM]): LAP (9.8 ± 1.2 cm), O-M (11.2 ± 3.3 cm), LCO (16.6 ± 5.4 cm) versus O-S (4.6 ± 1.6 cm) (p < 0.02). Actual recurrence rates at 1 and 5 years were LAP (15% and 29%), O-M (11% and 28%), O-S (10% and 19%), and LCO (35% and 60%). Multivariate analysis identified larger defects to have higher recurrence rates, particularly in the O-S group (p < 0.02). With the exception of the LCO group, surgical technique did not predict recurrence, nor did body mass index, diabetes, smoking, or use of tacks versus sutures. This is the first study to compare 5 year actual recurrence rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Contrary to prior reports, our longer-term data indicates similar recurrence rates, except for higher rates in the laparoscopic converted to open group. Due to the continued recurrences over the period studied, longer-term follow-up is necessary to appreciate the true rate of hernia recurrence.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: are transfascial sutures necessary? A review of the literatureSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Tension-Free Repair Versus Watchful Waiting for Men with Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Inguinal Hernias: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006
- Primary incisional hernia repair with or without polypropylene mesh: a report on 384 patients with 5-year follow-upLangenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2005
- Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional HerniaAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Milestones in the history of hernia surgery: Prosthetic repairHernia, 2004
- Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral HerniasAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repairSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Recurrences After Conventional Anterior and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia RepairAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2000
- Prospective, multicenter study of laparoscopic ventral hernioplastySurgical Endoscopy, 1998