A Novel Prediction Tool for Endoscopic Intervention in Patients with Acute Upper Gastro-Intestinal Bleeding
Authors:
Open Access
- 5 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (19) , 5893
Abstract
(1) Background: Predicting which patients with upper gastro-intestinal bleeding (UGIB) will receive intervention during urgent endoscopy can allow for better triaging and resource utilization but remains sub-optimal. Using machine learning modelling we aimed to devise an improved endoscopic intervention predicting tool. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with UGIB between 2012–2018 who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during hospitalization. We assessed the correlation between various parameters with endoscopic intervention and examined the prediction performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) and the pre-endoscopic Rockall score for endoscopic intervention. We also trained and tested a new machine learning-based model for the prediction of endoscopic intervention. (3) Results: A total of 883 patients were included. Risk factors for endoscopic intervention included cirrhosis (9.0% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01), syncope at presentation (19.3% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.01), early EGD (6.8 h vs. 17.0 h, p < 0.01), pre-endoscopic administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) (43.4% vs. 31.0%, p < 0.01) and erythromycin (17.2% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.01). Higher GBS (11 vs. 9, p < 0.01) and pre-endoscopy Rockall score (4.7 vs. 4.1, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with endoscopic intervention; however, the predictive performance of the scores was low (AUC of 0.54, and 0.56, respectively). A combined machine learning-developed model demonstrated improved predictive ability (AUC 0.68) using parameters not included in standard GBS. (4) Conclusions: The GBS and pre-endoscopic Rockall score performed poorly in endoscopic intervention prediction. An improved predictive tool has been proposed here. Further studies are needed to examine if predicting this important triaging decision can be further optimized.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleedingGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2013
- A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleedingGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011
- Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK auditGut, 2011
- Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide auditGut, 2010
- International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Changing trends in acute upper-GI bleeding: a population-based studyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009
- A risk score to predict need for treatment for uppergastrointestinal haemorrhageThe Lancet, 2000
- Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.Gut, 1996
- Endoscopic HemostasisJAMA, 1990
- Endoscopic hemostasis. An effective therapy for bleeding peptic ulcersJAMA, 1990