Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III–V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment
Authors:
- 22 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
- Vol. 128 (10) , 1153-1157
Abstract
Introduction The management of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ-) injuries especially of type III is still controversial. Methods In this retrospective study the results of early ACJ reconstructions immediately after trauma (group early repair, ER) were compared with the results of delayed reconstructions in patients who first got conservative treatment and failed after some time (group delayed repair, DR). Overall, 49 patients were analysed clinically and radiographically with a mean follow-up of 53 months (range 20–92). In group ER twenty-nine patients were treated with a modified Phemister technique according to Mayr including a PDS coracoclavicular sling and temporary K- wire fixation. In group DR twenty patients were treated with a modified Weaver–Dunn-procedure with additionally transposition of the coracoacromial ligament and AC-joint resection. Results A comparison of the overall results revealed a statistically significant better outcome in the early repair group, regarding the Constant Score, the degree of acromioclavicularjoint-reduction, numbers of complications and patient`s satisfaction. Conclusion Our results point out that early reconstruction of ACJ-injuries in type III–V avoids the inferior clinical results of delayed reconstructions using a modified Weaver–Dunn-procedure.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injuryJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2006
- Grade I and II acromioclavicular dislocations: results of conservative treatmentJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2003
- Decision making: operative versus nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuriesClinics in Sports Medicine, 2003
- Konservative oder operative Therapie der Schultereckgelenkverletzung – was ist gesichert ? Eine systematische Literaturanalyse nach Kriterien der „evidence based medicine“Der Chirurg, 2000
- Central K-wire and PDS-Cord for Acromioclavicular separations - a successful treatment?Der Unfallchirurg, 1999
- Acromioclavicular DislocationClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998
- Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries and Distal Clavicle FracturesJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1997
- Die operative Behandlung der akromioklavikulären LuxationOperative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 1994
- Strength testing after third-degree acromioclavicular dislocationsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1992
- Complete Acromioclavicular SeparationsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1987