The origin of factor scores: Spearman, Thomson and Bartlett
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- other
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
- Vol. 62 (3) , 569-582
Abstract
The indeterminacy of factor scores has been a perennial source of debate since the time of Spearman. The main purpose of this paper is to show that, in spite of his inadequate tools and concepts, Sir Godfrey Thomson's approach of 70 years ago was on the right lines. His thinking was constrained by the primitive state of his statistical understanding but it is illuminated by his substantial exchange of the correspondence with M. S. Bartlett in the 1930s, most of which has survived in the Godfrey Thomson archive at the University of Edinburgh. In order to justify our claim and clarify the issues, we have found it necessary to fill in some of the gaps in the original derivations of Spearman, Thomson and Bartlett and to express their work in terms which are intelligible today. The opportunity is taken to relate this earlier work to contemporary debates.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metaphor Taken as Math: Indeterminancy in the Factor Analysis ModelMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1996
- The cold equations: Spearman and Wilson on factor indeterminacyBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1995
- A Conversation with Maurice BartlettStatistical Science, 1989
- The Measurement of Factor IndeterminacyPsychometrika, 1974
- THE DETERMINACY OF FACTOR SCORE MATRICES WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR FIVE OTHER BASIC PROBLEMS OF COMMON‐FACTOR THEORY 1British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955
- Methods of Estimating Mental FactorsNature, 1938
- THE STATISTICAL CONCEPTION OF MENTAL FACTORSBritish Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1937
- THE STATISTICAL ESTIMATION OF GBritish Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1935
- Measuring General Intelligence by Tests which break the g-HierarchyNature, 1935
- Estimation of General AbilityNature, 1935