Global distribution of ionospheric and field‐aligned currents during substorms as determined from six IMS meridian chains of magnetometers: Initial results
Authors:
- Y. KamideYKY. Kamide
- B.‐H. AhnBAB.‐H. Ahn
- S. ‐I. AkasofuSAS. ‐I. Akasofu
- W. BaumjohannWBW. Baumjohann
- E. Friis‐ChristensenEFE. Friis‐Christensen
- H. W. KroehlHKH. W. Kroehl
- H. MaurerHMH. Maurer
- A. D. RichmondARA. D. Richmond
- G. RostokerGRG. Rostoker
- R. W. SpiroRSR. W. Spiro
- J. K. WalkerJWJ. K. Walker
- A. N. ZaitzevAZA. N. Zaitzev
Open Access
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 87 (A10) , 8228-8240
Abstract
As a part of the joint efforts of operating six meridian chains of magnetometers during the IMS, magnetic records from 70 stations are used to deduce patterns of electric fields and currents in high latitudes on March 17, 18, and 19, 1978. First of all this data set is used to examine the fidelity of the AE(12) index by comparing it with the AE(70) index and also the fidelity of the AL(70) index as a measure of the total westward electrojet intensity. The coefficients for the two correlations are found to be more than 0.8. Then the distribution of both ionospheric currents and field‐aligned currents, as well as the electric field, are for the first time determined with a time resolution of 5 min by using an appropriate conductivity distribution model. Although much improvement is still needed for better accuracy, especially in the estimation of ionospheric conductivity, it has now become possible to study the growth and decay of the three‐dimensional current system over the north polar region during individual magnetospheric substorms with sufficient time resolution. Our initial results show that the gross features of the instantaneous distributions of the ionospheric and field‐aligned currents are remarkably similar to the daily average pattern during a very weak activity and at different substorm epochs and that the large‐scale current pattern grows and decays systematically as a whole. There are, however, significant changes in local scales.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of two modeling methods for three‐dimensional current systemsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1981
- Joint two-dimensional observations of ground magnetic and ionospheric electric fields associated with auroral zone currents. 2. Three-dimensional current flow in the morning sector during substorm recovery.Journal of geomagnetism and geoelectricity, 1981
- Day‐to‐day and average magnetic variations along the IMS Alaska Meridian Chain of observatories and modeling of a three‐dimensional current systemJournal of Geophysical Research, 1980
- Joint two‐dimensional observations of ground magnetic and ionospheric electric fields associated with auroral zone currents 1. Three‐dimensional current flows associated with a substorm‐intensified eastward electrojetJournal of Geophysical Research, 1980
- Simulation studies of ionospheric electric fields and currents in relation to field‐aligned currents, 1. Quiet periodsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1979
- Chatanika Radar observations of the latitudinal distributions of auroral zone electric fields, conductivities, and currentsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1978
- Electric and magnetic fields in the high‐latitude magnetosphereReviews of Geophysics, 1977
- The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by TriadJournal of Geophysical Research, 1976
- The polar electrojetJournal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 1965
- Eccentric Dipole CoordinatesAustralian Journal of Physics, 1963