A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3 occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 120 (3) , 240-246
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- International comparisons of professional assessments in orthodontics: Part 1—Treatment needAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United StatesCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1997
- The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficultyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995
- The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validityEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1992
- Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standardsBritish Dental Journal, 1991
- The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priorityEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1989
- The occlusal index: A system for identifying and scoring occlusal disordersAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1971
- Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priorityAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1968
- The relationship between occlusion and periodontal statusAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1961
- Handicapping labio-lingual deviations: A proposed index for public health purposesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1960