Comparative performance of graphene and MXenes in flexible pressure sensors
Open Access
- 16 January 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Sensors & Diagnostics
- Vol. 5 (4) , 455-487
Abstract
Graphene excels at ultra-low pressures (microcrack/tunneling), while MXene porous networks deliver a wider pressure range and stability; this review provides selection guidelines for flexible pressure sensors.Keywords
This publication has 171 references indexed in Scilit:
- MXene‐Polymer Hydrogel Sensors for Next‐Generation Advanced Wearable Sensing: From Synthesis to Real World IntegrationAdvanced Materials Technologies, 2025
- Empowering Human‐Machine Interfaces: Self‐Powered Hydrogel Sensors for Flexible and Intelligent SystemsAdvanced Functional Materials, 2025
- Solution Processing of MXenes for Printing, Wet Coating, and 2D Film Formation2024
- Self‐Repairable Hybrid Piezoresistive‐Triboelectric Sensor Cum Nanogenerator Utilizing Dual‐Dynamic Reversible Network in Mechanically Robust Modified Natural RubberAdvanced Sensor Research, 2024
- Recent Advances in Flexible Pressure Sensors Based on MXene MaterialsAdvanced Materials, 2024
- Ultralight and Hyperelastic Nanofiber‐Reinforced MXene–Graphene Aerogel for High‐Performance Piezoresistive SensorAdvanced Materials Technologies, 2021
- The Assembly of MXenes from 2D to 3DAdvanced Science, 2020
- MXene Composite and Coaxial Fibers with High Stretchability and Conductivity for Wearable Strain Sensing TextilesAdvanced Functional Materials, 2020
- Energy‐Autonomous, Flexible, and Transparent Tactile SkinAdvanced Functional Materials, 2017
- Progress and Challenges in Transfer of Large‐Area Graphene FilmsAdvanced Science, 2016