Evaluating Recall Periods for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Methods
Authors:
- 9 February 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 27 (4) , 518-526
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- AstraZeneca
- Mars
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constructing arguments for the interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures in research: an application of modern validity theoryQuality of Life Research, 2021
- PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2016
- Psychometric characteristics of daily diaries for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): a preliminary investigationQuality of Life Research, 2012
- Web-Based Sex Diaries and Young Adult Men Who Have Sex with Men: Assessing Feasibility, Reactivity, and Data AgreementArchives of Sexual Behavior, 2012
- Can a single pain rating replace a multiple pain rating in third molar surgery studies? Analysis of 220 patientsInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012
- Choice of recall period for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: criteria for considerationQuality of Life Research, 2011
- Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-hour recall of symptoms of cystic fibrosisJournal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2010
- Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-h recall of type 2 diabetesQuality of Life Research, 2010
- Validity of average, minimum, and maximum end-of-day recall assessments of pain and fatigueContemporary Clinical Trials, 2010
- Accuracy of recall of the items included in disease activity forms of Behçet’s disease: comparison of retrospective questionnaires with a daily telephone interviewClinical Rheumatology, 2008