Ectopic Eye Tooth Management: Photobiomodulation/Low-Level Laser Emission Role in Root Resorption after Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
Authors:
- Mohammad Khursheed AlamMohammad Khursheed Alam
- Kiran Kumar GanjiKGKiran Kumar Ganji
- Ahmed Ali AlfawzanAAAhmed Ali Alfawzan
- Srinivas Munisekhar ManaySMSrinivas Munisekhar Manay
- Kumar Chandan SrivastavaKumar Chandan Srivastava
- Prabhat Kumar ChaudhariPCPrabhat Kumar Chaudhari
- Hala A. HosniHala A. Hosni
- Haytham Jamil AlswairkiHAHaytham Jamil Alswairki
- Reem Ahmed AlansariReem Ahmed Alansari
Open Access
- 24 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Healthcare
- Vol. 10 (4) , 610
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluates the role of low-level laser emission/photobiomodulation (LE/P) in quantitative measurements of root resorption (QRR). The application of LE/P performed after each orthodontic activation with four types of treatment intervention (TI) on the root resorption (RR) after fixed orthodontic treatment (FOT) of the upper arch with ectopic eye tooth/teeth [EET] was investigated. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two orthodontic patients scheduled for FOT were selected and assigned to the four groups. These were LE/P + Self ligating bracket (SLB), LE/P + Conventional bracket (CB), non-photobiomodulation (non-LE/P) + SLB and non-LE/P + CB. Standard management stages of FOT were followed in the maxilla. Each patient received a single application of LE/P labially/buccally and palatally, a total of five different points were used during each activation or appointment. The main outcome measure was QRR in maxillary anteriors before and after FOT, assessed via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using 3D OnDemand software. Results: Insignificant QRR was found between before and after FOT in SLB, CLB, and LE/P, non-LE/P groups (p > 0.05). QRR in the SLB vs. CB and LE/P vs. non-LE/P group was significantly different in 11, 13, and 23 (p < 0.05). QRR in the LE/P + SLB group (p < 0.05) was significantly different in 11, 13, and 23 than that in the other groups. The most severe QRR was found on 13 (0.88 ± 0.28 mm and 0.87 ± 0.27 mm) and 23 (1.19 ± 0.14 mm and 1.16±0.13 mm) in the CB and non-LE/P group (p < 0.001). LE/P + SLB showed a highly significant superior outcome (p < 0.001) in relation to non-LE/P + CB, the QRR of 23 were 0.813 ± 0.114 mm and 1.156 ± 0.166 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Significantly higher amounts of QRR were found in EET patients after FOT treated with the CB, non-LE/P, and non-LE/P + CB system and warrant further investigation to explore potential specific causes.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University (DSR-2021-01-0207)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: A clinical perspectiveThe Saudi Dental Journal, 2011
- Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010
- Root resorption before and after orthodontic treatment: a clinical study of contributory factorsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 2010
- Editor's Summary and Q&AAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009
- In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisorsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009
- External apical root resorption in patients treated with conventional and self-ligating bracketsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2008
- External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1- versus 2-phase treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2003
- Leukotrienes in orthodontic tooth movementAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1989
- Root resorption after orthodontic treatment of traumatized teethAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1982
- The nature of tooth movementAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1973