Conceptualizing Space: Reply
Authors:
- Luc AnselinLALuc Anselin
- Wendy K. Tam ChoWCWendy K. Tam Cho
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Political Analysis
- Vol. 10 (3) , 301-303
Abstract
We read with interest the sundry points raised by King in his comment (2002) on our article (Anselin and Cho 2002). Given the space and time constraints in this forum, it is impossible for us to address adequately all of the issues here. It is sufficient to say that we strongly disagree with King's claims that we are “missing the point.” We will pursue a more thorough and formal rebuttal elsewhere, but would like to set the record straight on a few issues in the limited space provided here.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial Effects and Ecological InferencePolitical Analysis, 2002
- Isolating Spatial Autocorrelation, Aggregation Bias, and Distributional Violations in Ecological Inference: Comment on Anselin and ChoPolitical Analysis, 2002
- Geography, Statistics, and Ecological InferenceAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 2000
- Spatial Correlation: A Suggested Alternative to the Autoregressive Model1995
- Statistics for Spatial Data1993