Community‐Wide Dissemination of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Use Using a 45‐Minute Chest Compression–Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training
Open Access
- 8 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Heart Association
- Vol. 8 (1) , e009436
Abstract
Background: Little is known about whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation ( CPR ) training can increase bystander CPR in the community or the appropriate target number of CPR trainings. Herein, we aimed to demonstrate community‐wide aggressive dissemination of CPR training and evaluate temporal trends in bystander CPR . Methods and Results: We provided CPR training (45‐minute chest compression–only CPR plus automated external defibrillator use training or the conventional CPR training), targeting 16% of residents. All emergency medical service–treated out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrests of medical origin were included. Data on patients experiencing out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest and bystander CPR quality were prospectively collected from September 2010 to December 2015. The primary outcome was the proportion of high‐quality bystander CPR . During the study period, 57 173 residents (14.7%) completed the chest compression–only CPR training and 32 423 (8.3%) completed conventional CPR training. The proportion of bystander CPR performed did not change (from 43.3% in 2010 to 42.0% in 2015; P for trend=0.915), but the proportion of high‐quality bystander CPR delivery increased from 11.7% in 2010 to 20.7% in 2015 ( P for trend=0.015). The 1‐year increment was associated with high‐quality bystander CPR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.461; 95% CI, 1.055–2.024). Bystanders who previously experienced CPR training were 3.432 times (95% CI, 1.170–10.071) more likely to perform high‐quality CPR than those who did not. Conclusions: We trained 23.0% of the residents in the medium‐sized city of Osaka, Japan, and demonstrated that the proportion of high‐quality CPR performed on the scene increased gradually, whereas that of bystander CPR delivered overall remained stable.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Provision in Communities With Low Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation RatesCirculation, 2013
- Chest Compression–Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Public-Access DefibrillationCirculation, 2012
- The Effectiveness of Ultrabrief and Brief Educational Videos for Training Lay Responders in Hands-Only Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2011
- Chest-compression-only versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2010
- Continuous Improvements in “Chain of Survival” Increased Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestsCirculation, 2009
- Effectiveness of Bystander-Initiated Cardiac-Only Resuscitation for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestCirculation, 2007
- Survival Is Similar After Standard Treatment and Chest Compression Only in Out-of-Hospital Bystander Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCirculation, 2007
- CPR Training and CPR Performance: Do CPR‐trained Bystanders Perform CPR?Academic Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Work-Site AIDS ProgramsJournal of Health Communication, 1998
- A peer-training model for instruction of basic cardiac life supportResuscitation, 1995