Does the Robotic Platform Reduce Morbidity Associated With Combined Radical Surgery and Adjuvant Radiation for Early Cervical Cancers?
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 October 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
- Vol. 26 (8) , 1485-1489
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancerGynecologic Oncology, 2012
- Surgery Versus Radiation Therapy for Stage IB2 Cervical CarcinomaInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2012
- Comparison of outcomes between radical hysterectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy versus primary chemoradiation therapy in IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancerJournal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2012
- Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009
- Robotic approach for cervical cancer: Comparison with laparotomy A case control studyGynecologic Oncology, 2009
- A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Robotic Surgery for Cervical CancerYonsei Medical Journal, 2008
- Adhesion-Related Bowel Obstruction After Hysterectomy for Benign ConditionsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- A Randomized Trial of Pelvic Radiation Therapy versus No Further Therapy in Selected Patients with Stage IB Carcinoma of the Cervix after Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group StudyGynecologic Oncology, 1999
- Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancerThe Lancet, 1997