Outcome in Direct Versus Transfer Patients in the DAWN Controlled Trial
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 50 (8) , 2163-2167
Abstract
Background and Purpose—: The impact of transfer status on clinical outcomes in the DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo) population is unknown. We analyzed workflow and clinical outcome differences between direct versus transfer patients in the DAWN population. Methods—: The following time metrics were analyzed for each group: (1) last known well to hospital arrival, (2) hospital arrival to eligibility imaging, (3) hospital arrival to arterial puncture, (4) qualifying imaging to arterial puncture, (5) last known well to arterial puncture, (6) last known well to reperfusion. The primary end point was the rate of functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score, 0–2). Using univariate unconditional logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios and 95% CIs for the association between clinically relevant time metrics, transfer status, and functional independence (mRS 0–2). Results—: A total of 206 patients were enrolled. Among these, 121 (59%) patients were transferred, and 85 (41%) patients presented directly to a thrombectomy capable center. Median time last seen well to hospital arrival time was similar between the 2 groups (678 versus 696 minutes). The time from hospital arrival to groin puncture was significantly longer in direct patients compared with transferred patients 140 minutes (interquartile range, 105.5–177.5 minutes) and 88 minutes (interquartile range, 55–125 minutes), respectively ( P P =0.817). Conclusions—: Although transfer patients had a faster door to puncture time, benefits of thrombectomy, and rates of mRS 0 to 2 in the treatment group were similar between direct and transferred patients in the DAWN population. These results may inform prehospital and primary stroke centers triage protocols in patients presenting in the late time window. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02142283.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Late Window ParadoxStroke, 2018
- Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and InfarctNew England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Referral facility CT perfusion prior to inter-facility transfer in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomyJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2017
- Interhospital Transfer Before Thrombectomy Is Associated With Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke)Circulation, 2017
- Fast Versus Slow Progressors of Infarct Growth in Large Vessel Occlusion StrokeStroke, 2017
- Effects of Workflow Optimization in Endovascularly Treated Stroke Patients – A Pre-Post Effectiveness StudyPLOS ONE, 2016
- Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment on Thrombectomy Outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) Randomized, Controlled TrialCirculation, 2016
- Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment and the Effects on Outcome in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results from the SWIFT PRIME Randomized Controlled TrialRadiology, 2016
- Streamlining door to recanalization processes in endovascular stroke therapyJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2016
- Optimal Workflow and Process-Based Performance Measures for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2014