Communicating for Aquatic Conservation in Cambodia and Beyond: Lessons Learned from In-Person and Media-Based Environmental Education and Outreach Strategies
Authors:
- Erin K. LouryELErin K. Loury
- Jackman C. EschenroederJEJackman C. Eschenroeder
- Lykheang SeatLSLykheang Seat
- Seila CheaSeila Chea
- Chheana ChhutCCChheana Chhut
- Suthep KritsanavarinSKSuthep Kritsanavarin
- Stefan LovgrenSLStefan Lovgren
- Elizabeth G. RamsayERElizabeth G. Ramsay
- Dee ThaoDTDee Thao
- Zeb S. HoganZeb S. Hogan
Open Access
Abstract
Communication and outreach efforts are essential for raising awareness about conservation issues among the general public. This paper reviews three in-person approaches (environmental education, outreach events, and field trips), as well as four types of media (print products, news media, visual media, and social media) for communicating about environmental topics, with a focus on highlighting conservation issues in Cambodia. Strengths and weaknesses are considered for each communication tool, along with lessons from a case study example of the Wonders of the Mekong, an interdisciplinary project based in Cambodia that aims to study, protect, and raise awareness about the Mekong River system. We also describe a cross-cutting initiative to share inspiring stories of local conservation practitioners that incorporates both in-person and media-based approaches. In terms of required resources and effort, there is an inherent tradeoff between the depth of in-person engagement and overall reach. While media-based approaches are valuable for reaching large numbers of people with a moderate amount of effort, in-person approaches may create a deeper connection and longer-term impact on an individual level. Ultimately, a diverse communication strategy that utilizes multiple tools to reach different audiences will be most effective. The interdisciplinary Wonders of the Mekong project has successfully communicated the values of the Mekong ecosystem to a broad audience in Cambodia using a variety of strategies, and further evaluation could help illuminate whether and how these communication approaches are shifting attitudes or promoting conservation behaviors.Keywords
Funding Information
- United States Agency for International Development (Wonders of the Mekong’ Cooperative Agreement No: AID-OAA-A-16-00057)
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Meaningful Watershed Educational Experiences: An exploration into the effects on participating students’ environmental stewardship characteristics and the relationships between these predictors of environmentally responsible behaviorStudies in Educational Evaluation, 2014
- Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreationScientific Reports, 2013
- Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River BasinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Conservation Means BehaviorConservation Biology, 2011
- Freshwaters in the Public Eye: Understanding the Role of Images and Media in Aquatic ConservationFisheries, 2009
- What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractionsAmerican Journal of Botany, 2009
- Organizational context and face-to-face interaction: Influences on the development of trust and collaborative behaviors in computer-mediated groupsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009
- Students as Catalysts of Environmental Change: a framework for researching intergenerational influence through environmental educationEnvironmental Education Research, 1998
- Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science LearningStudies in Science Education, 1996
- Environmental Education in the K-12 Curriculum: Finding a NicheThe Journal of Environmental Education, 1992