Ancrod in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Authors:
- David E. LevyDLDavid E. Levy
- Gregory J. del ZoppoGZGregory J. del Zoppo
- Bart M. DemaerschalkBDBart M. Demaerschalk
- Andrew M. DemchukADAndrew M. Demchuk
- Hans-Christoph DienerHDHans-Christoph Diener
- George HowardGHGeorge Howard
- Markku KasteMKMarkku Kaste
- Arthur M. PancioliAPArthur M. Pancioli
- E. Bernd RingelsteinERE. Bernd Ringelstein
- Carmen SpatareanuCSCarmen Spatareanu
- Warren W. WasiewskiWWWarren W. Wasiewski
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 40 (12) , 3796-3803
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Previous studies of multiple-day dosing with the defibrinogenating agent, ancrod, in acute ischemic stroke yielded conflicting results but suggested that a brief dosing regimen might improve efficacy and safety. The Ancrod Stroke Program was designed to test this concept in subjects beginning ancrod or placebo within 6 hours of the onset of acute ischemic stroke. Methods— Five hundred subjects with acute ischemic stroke who could begin receiving study material within 6 hours of symptom onset were infused intravenously with either ancrod (0.167 IU/kg per hour) or placebo over 2 or 3 hours. The primary efficacy outcome was a dichotomized, modified Rankin score at 90 days with less stringent cut-points for higher prestroke modified Rankin score and pretreatment NIHSS total score (“responder analysis”). Safety variables included mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. Results— Although the desired changes in fibrinogen level were seen in >90% of ancrod subjects, interim analysis for futility led to the study being halted for lack of efficacy. Positive responder status in the interim dataset was seen in 39.6% of ancrod subjects and 37.2% of placebo subjects ( P =0.47). Ninety-day mortality did not differ between the 2 groups (ancrod, 15.6%; placebo, 14.1%; P =0.32), and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within the first 72 hours, although not significantly different in ancrod compared to placebo subjects ( P =0.19), was approximately twice as high (3.9% vs 2.0%; P =0.19). Conclusion— These results demonstrate that intravenous ancrod starting within 6 hours after symptom onset in a broad selection of subjects with ischemic stroke did not improve their outcome and revealed a trend to increased bleeding despite successful efforts to achieve rapid initial defibrinogenation and avoid prolonged hypofibrinogenemia.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hyperfibrinogenemia and Functional Outcome From Acute Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2009
- Ancrod for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A New Dosing Regimen Derived from Analysis of Prior Ancrod Stroke StudiesJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2009
- Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 Hours after Acute Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Hemostatic Activation and Outcome After Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Therapy for Acute Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2006
- PREFACE: SNAKE VENOMS and HEMOSTASISToxin Reviews, 2006
- Measuring Outcomes as a Function of Baseline Severity of Ischemic StrokeCerebrovascular Diseases, 2004
- Intravenous Ancrod for Treatment of Acute Ischemic StrokeJAMA, 2000
- Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Intravenous Thrombolysis With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Hemispheric StrokeJAMA, 1995
- Designs for group sequential testsControlled Clinical Trials, 1984