Strategies for Managing Evaluation Anxiety: Toward a Psychology of Program Evaluation
Authors:
- Stewart I. DonaldsonSDStewart I. Donaldson
- Laura E. GoolerLGLaura E. Gooler
- Michael ScrivenMSMichael Scriven
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Evaluation
- Vol. 23 (3) , 261-273
Abstract
Excessive evaluation anxiety (XEA) can be a destructive phenomenon in modern program evaluation. Some of the negative consequences include: Lack of access to important information and data; compliance and cooperation problems; false reporting; effects on bias and validity; and reduced utilization of evaluation findings. If left alone, XEA can lead stakeholders to behave in ways that destroy the credibility of evaluation findings and evaluators. The purpose of this paper is to examine the sources and signs of XEA in program evaluation, and to provide practicing evaluators with strategies to prevent and manage this common problem. This example of how more than technical skills are required to conduct high quality program evaluations illustrates the need for and begins a broader discussion of the psychology of evaluation.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Vision for EvaluationAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2001
- Overcoming our Negative Reputation: Evaluation Becomes Known as a Helping ProfessionAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2001
- Cognitive processes, anxiety, and performance on doctoral dissertation oral examinations.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1992
- Handbook of Social and Evaluation Anxiety1990
- Dating Anxiety1990
- Test Anxiety1990
- Guilt, Shame, and Embarrassment1990
- The effects of program evaluation feedback on staff attitudesCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1988
- Writing Persuasive DocumentsThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1987
- The Effects of Demand Characteristics, Evaluation Anxiety, and Expectancy on Juror Honesty During Voir DireThe Journal of Psychology, 1986