Comparison of magnetic resonance enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy with balloon-assisted enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
Authors:
- 23 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Endoscopy
- Vol. 44 (07) , 668-673
Abstract
Background and study aims: New modalities are available for visualization of the small bowel in patients with possible obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), but their performance requires further comparison. This study compared the diagnostic yield of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and capsule endoscopy in patients with OGIB, using balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) as the reference standard. Patients and methods: Consecutive consenting patients who were referred for evaluation of OGIB were prospectively included. Patients underwent MRE followed by capsule endoscopy and BAE. Patients with high grade stenosis at MRE did not undergo capsule endoscopy. The reference standard was BAE findings in visualized small-bowel segments and expert panel consensus for segments not visualized during BAE. Results: Over a period of 26 months, 38 patients were included (20 female [53 %]; mean age 58 years, range 28 – 75 years). Four patients (11 %) did not undergo capsule endoscopy due to high grade small-bowel stenosis at MRE (n = 3; 8 %) or timing issues (n = 1; 3 %). Capsule endoscopy was non-diagnostic in one patient. The reference standard identified abnormal findings in 20 patients (53 %). MRE had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 21 %, 100 %, infinity, and 0.79, respectively. The corresponding values for capsule endoscopy were 61 %, 85 %, 4.1, and 0.46. The reference standard and capsule endoscopy did not differ in percent positive findings (P = 0.34), but MRE differed significantly from the reference BAE (P < 0.001). Capsule endoscopy was superior to MRE for detecting abnormalities (P = 0.0015). Conclusion: Capsule endoscopy performed better than MRE in the detection of small-bowel abnormality in patients with OGIB. MRE may be considered as an alternative for the initial examination in patients with clinical suspicion of small-bowel stenosis.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Degree of concordance between double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter studyEndoscopy, 2009
- Jejunum abnormalities at MR enteroclysisEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2008
- Double-Balloon Enteroscopy and Capsule Endoscopy Have Comparable Diagnostic Yield in Small-Bowel Disease: A Meta-AnalysisClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2008
- Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Role of videocapsule and double-balloon enteroscopyBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2008
- Double Balloon Enteroscopy Detects Small Bowel Mass Lesions Missed by Capsule EndoscopyDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008
- Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique/double-balloon enteroscopyDigestive and Liver Disease, 2006
- Capsule endoscopy: Where are we after 6 years of clinical use?Digestive and Liver Disease, 2006
- Adult celiac disease: MRI findingsAbdominal Radiology, 2006
- Results of Videocapsule Endoscopy ∊ 250 Patients With Suspected Small Bowel PathologyDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2006
- MR Enteroclysis: Imaging Technique of Choice in Diagnosis of Small Bowel DiseasesDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2005