Specifying and Standardizing Performance Measures for Use at a National Level
Authors:
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Care Research and Review
- Vol. 64 (2_suppl) , 64S-81S
Abstract
This article explicates a comprehensive process for identifying, specifying, testing, and implementing nationally standardized performance measures. A growing body of research ties nurse staffing to patient outcomes, reinforcing the important role of nursing in the delivery of safe, efficacious health care. The Joint Commission has developed a multistep process to identify robust sets of evidence-based measures that includes a review of the evidence, expert advisory panel guidance, use of established criteria, public input and comment, and multistage field testing before implementation. This proven approach to the establishment of performance metrics is applicable to the identification and implementation of nurse-sensitive workforce measures. These metrics can then be used by providers to support performance improvement activities by health care stakeholders to monitor nurse staffing-related issues, and by researchers to better understand the relationship between staffing effectiveness and patient safety, and the quality of health care.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- JCAHO’s Shared Visions-New Pathways: the new hospital survey and accreditation process for 2004American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2004
- Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job DissatisfactionJAMA, 2002
- Nurse Staffing and Postsurgical Adverse Events: An Analysis of Administrative Data from a Sample of U.S. Hospitals, 1990–1996Health Services Research, 2002
- Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in HospitalsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Integrating Performance Measure Data into the Joint Commission Accreditation ProcessEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1999
- Developing a Clinical Performance MeasureAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998
- Developing an Outcomes Measurement System: The Value of TestingAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 1996
- A Model to Assess the Usefulness of Performance IndicatorsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996
- Data-Driven Performance Improvement in Health Care: The Joint Commission’s Indicator Measurement System (IMSystem)The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1993
- E.A. Codman and the End Results Idea: A CommentaryThe Milbank Quarterly, 1989