Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10-coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data
Open Access
Abstract
Objective Administrative health data are important for health services and outcomes research. We optimised and validated in intensive care unit (ICU) patients an International Classification of Disease (ICD)-coded case definition for sepsis, and compared this with an existing definition. We also assessed the definition's performance in non-ICU (ward) patients. Setting and participants All adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted to a multisystem ICU with general medicosurgical ICU care from one of three tertiary care centres in the Calgary region in Alberta, Canada, between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2012 were included. Research design Patient medical records were randomly selected and linked to the discharge abstract database. In ICU patients, we validated the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) ICD-10-CA (Canadian Revision)-coded definition for sepsis and severe sepsis against a reference standard medical chart review, and optimised this algorithm through examination of other conditions apparent in sepsis. Measures Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results Sepsis was present in 604 of 1001 ICU patients (60.4%). The CIHI ICD-10-CA-coded definition for sepsis had Sn (46.4%), Sp (98.7%), PPV (98.2%) and NPV (54.7%); and for severe sepsis had Sn (47.2%), Sp (97.5%), PPV (95.3%) and NPV (63.2%). The optimised ICD-coded algorithm for sepsis increased Sn by 25.5% and NPV by 11.9% with slightly lowered Sp (85.4%) and PPV (88.2%). For severe sepsis both Sn (65.1%) and NPV (70.1%) increased, while Sp (88.2%) and PPV (85.6%) decreased slightly. Conclusions This study demonstrates that sepsis is highly undercoded in administrative data, thus under-ascertaining the true incidence of sepsis. The optimised ICD-coded definition has a higher validity with higher Sn and should be preferentially considered if used for surveillance purposes.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identifying Patients With Severe Sepsis Using Administrative ClaimsMedical Care, 2014
- Validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) Screening for Sepsis in Surgical MortalitiesSurgical Infections, 2014
- How many diagnosis fields are needed to capture safety events in administrative data? Findings and recommendations from the WHO ICD-11 Topic Advisory Group on Quality and SafetyInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2013
- The Development, Evolution, and Modifications of ICD-10Medical Care, 2010
- Long-term Cognitive Impairment and Functional Disability Among Survivors of Severe SepsisJAMA, 2010
- Validation of a Case Definition to Define Hypertension Using Administrative DataHypertension, 2009
- Sepsis incidence and outcome: Contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Long-term mortality and medical care charges in patients with severe sepsisCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions ConferenceCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Letʼs agree on terminologyCritical Care Medicine, 1991