Did aetiology matter in illness duration and complications in patients presenting in primary care with acute respiratory tract infections early in the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study in nine countries
Open Access
- 12 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 30 (1) , 2376084
Abstract
Despite considerable research into COVID-19 sequelae, little is known about differences in illness duration and complications in patients presenting in primary care with symptoms of acute respiratory tract infections (RTI) that are and are not attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. To explore whether aetiology impacted course of illness and prediction of complications in patients presenting in primary care with symptoms of RTI early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Between April 2020-March 2021 general practitioners from nine European countries recruited consecutively contacting patients with RTI symptoms. At baseline, an oropharyngeal-nasal swab was obtained for aetiology determination using PCR after follow-up of 28 days. Time to self-reported recovery was analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Predictors (baseline variables of demographics, patient and disease characteristics) of a complicated course (composite of hospital admission and persisting signs/symptoms at 28 days follow-up) were explored with logistic regression modelling. Of 855 patients with RTI symptoms, 237 (27.7%) tested SARS-CoV-2 positive. The proportion not feeling fully recovered (15.6% vs 18.1%, p = 0.39), reporting being extremely tired (9.7% vs 12.8%, p = 0.21), and not having returned to usual daily activities (18.1% vs 14.4%, p = 0.18) at day 28 were comparable between SARS-CoV-2 positive (n = 237) and negative (n = 618) groups. However, among those feeling fully recovered (SARS-CoV-2 positive: 200 patients, SARS-CoV-2 negative: 506 patients), time to full recovery was significantly longer in SARS-CoV-2 patients (10.6 vs 7.7 days, p < 0.001). We found no evidence that predictors of a complicated course differed between groups (p = 0.07). Early in the pandemic, the proportion of patients not feeling fully recovered by 28 days was similar between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients presenting in primary care with RTI symptoms, but it took somewhat longer for SARS-CoV-2 patients to feel fully recovered. More research is needed on predictors of a complicated course in RTI.Keywords
Funding Information
- Horizon 2020 (101003589)
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- True prevalence of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort studyNature Communications, 2023
- Clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: An observational study of respiratory tract infection in primary care in the early phase of the pandemicEuropean Journal of General Practice, 2023
- The prevalence and long-term health effects of Long Covid among hospitalised and non-hospitalised populations: a systematic review and meta-analysiseClinicalMedicine, 2022
- Association of Self-reported COVID-19 Infection and SARS-CoV-2 Serology Test Results With Persistent Physical Symptoms Among French Adults During the COVID-19 PandemicJAMA Internal Medicine, 2021
- Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort studyThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 2021
- Acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patientsScientific Reports, 2021
- Long COVID in a prospective cohort of home-isolated patientsNature Medicine, 2021
- Sequelae in adults at 12 months after mild‐to‐moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 2021
- Patients With Uncomplicated Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Have Long-Term Persistent Symptoms and Functional Impairment Similar to Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Cautionary Tale During a Global PandemicClinical Infectious Diseases, 2021
- Long COVID in the Faroe Islands: A Longitudinal Study Among Nonhospitalized PatientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2020