The Effect of Flowable Composite Lining Thickness with Various Curing Techniques on Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations: An in vitro Study
Authors:
- S Nagalaxmi ReddySRS Nagalaxmi Reddy
- Dn JayashankarDJDn Jayashankar
- Mohanthomas NainanMNMohanthomas Nainan
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing in The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
- Vol. 14 (1) , 56-60
Abstract
Aim: Aim of this study was to compare class II composite restoration using flowable composites as lining with various thickness and curing techniques by evaluating cervical marginal microleakage. Materials and methods: Fifty intact molars, each prepared with two box-only class II cavities, were randomly divided into five groups: Group I, P60 filling alone; group II, ultrathin flowable composite lining (0.5-1mm) cocured with overlying composite; group III, thin lining (1-1.5) cocured with overlying composite; group IV, ultrathin lining (0.5-1 mm) precured and group V, thin lining (1-1.5) precured. The teeth were then thermocycled for 1500 cycles (between 5 and 60 °C) and immersed in dye for 24 hours. Cervical microleakage was measured as the extent of dye penetration. Results: Cocured specimens (groups II and III) showed least microleakage and control specimens (group I) showed maximum microleakage. On comparison of curing techniques, cocured specimens (groups II and III) showed less microleakage than precured (groups IV and V). On comparison of lining thickness and type of curing, group IV showed less microleakage than group V. Groups II and III were statistically not significant. Conclusion: It was concluded from the results that ultrathin cocured flowable composite lining specimens improved the marginal sealing with decreased microleakage. Clinical significance: In this study, the application of additional flowable composite lining with various thicknesses presented different influences in marginal quality of class II box only composite restorations. A new technique applying an ultrathin flowable composite lining with cocuring technique improved the marginal sealing with decreased microleakage. Restorations with thin lining presented reduced marginal integrity after thermocycling. How to cite this article: Reddy SN, Jayashankar DN, Nainan M, Shivanna V. The Effect of Flowable Composite Lining Thickness with Various Curing Techniques on Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):56-60.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulationsJournal of Conservative Dentistry, 2010
- The Effect of Flowable Materials on the Microleakage of Class II Composite Restorations That Extend Apical to the Cemento-enamel JunctionOperative Dentistry, 2009
- Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUsIndian Journal of Dental Research, 2009
- Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorationsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2001
- Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesivesDental Materials, 1999
- The Dependence of Shrinkage Stress Reduction on Porosity Concentration in Thin Resin LayersJournal of Dental Research, 1992