A Systematic Literature Review: Code Bad Smells in Java Source Code
Authors:
- 15 July 2017
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 665-682
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- What you like in design use to correct bad-smellsSoftware Quality Journal, 2012
- Clones: what is that smell?Empirical Software Engineering, 2011
- An exploratory study of the impact of antipatterns on class change- and fault-pronenessEmpirical Software Engineering, 2011
- Code Bad Smells: a review of current knowledgeJournal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 2010
- An empirical study on the maintenance of source code clonesEmpirical Software Engineering, 2009
- Exception handling refactorings: Directed by goals and driven by bug fixingJournal of Systems and Software, 2009
- “Cloning considered harmful” considered harmful: patterns of cloning in softwareEmpirical Software Engineering, 2008
- An empirical study of the bad smells and class error probability in the post-release object-oriented system evolutionJournal of Systems and Software, 2007
- Subjective evaluation of software evolvability using code smells: An empirical studyEmpirical Software Engineering, 2006
- Adaptive Detection of Design FlawsElectronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2005