Effect of adhesive system type and root region on the push‐out bond strength of glass–fibre posts to radicular dentine
Authors:
- 2 March 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Endodontic Journal
- Vol. 43 (4) , 259-268
Abstract
Onay EO, Korkmaz Y, Kiremitci A. Effect of adhesive system type and root region on the push‐out bond strength of glass–fibre posts to radicular dentine. International Endodontic Journal, 43, 76–85, 2010. Aim To compare interfacial strength in different thirds of the root canal amongst glass–fibre posts luted with four different adhesive luting agents.Methodology A total of 44 extracted human single‐rooted teeth were randomly divided in four groups and restored using glass–fibre posts and the following luting agents: All Bond SE/Duo‐Link (ABSE), All Bond 3/Duo‐Link (AB3), BisCem (BC), Clearfil ED primer II/Clearfil Esthetic Cement (CLF). One week after luting, the samples were thermocycled in water, and then embedded in acrylic resin. Three sections (cervical, middle and apical) of 2 mm thickness were prepared from each specimen, and the post in each section was subjected to a push‐out test. One additional specimen for each group was prepared for scanning electron microscopy analysis and the bonding effectiveness to dentine was assessed. The data were analysed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, two‐way anova, one‐way anova, and the Scheffe test (P < 0.05).Results The push‐out bond strength values for BC and ABSE were not significantly different (P > 0.05), but both were significantly higher than the means for AB3 and CLF (P < 0.05) in the cervical and middle regions. The same trend was observed in the apical region, except for the AB3 and ABSE which were not significantly different (P > 0.05) from each other. There were significant differences in bond strength amongst root thirds, with a reduction in values from the cervical to apical third (P < 0.05).Conclusions The use of BisCem and All Bond SE/Duo‐Link combination with their simplified application procedures may be considered an alternative to the currently used systems for luting glass–fibre posts in root canal.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of two fiber post types and two luting cement systems on regional post retention using the push-out testDental Materials, 2008
- The effect of two luting agents, pretreatment of the post, and pretreatment of the canal dentin on the retention of fiber-reinforced composite postsJournal of Dentistry, 2008
- Influence of endodontic sealers on the bond strength of carbon fiber postsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2007
- Comparison of regional bond strength in root thirds among fiber‐reinforced posts luted with different cementsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2007
- Effect of solvent content on resin hybridization in wet dentin bondingJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2007
- Leakage along apical root fillings with and without smear layer using two different leakage models: a two‐month longitudinal ex vivo studyInternational Endodontic Journal, 2006
- Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentinDental Materials, 2004
- The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push‐out bond strength measurementsEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 2004
- Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systemsDental Materials, 2000
- The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistryDental Materials, 1992