Environmental, social, and corporate governance activities with employee psychological well-being improvement
Open Access
- 6 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 22 (1) , 1-12
Abstract
Background: Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) engagement is expected to benefit corporations in terms of their efficiency and sustainability. The transformative change in management practices would not only provide support for employees but also bring about additional workload, which may affect employee psychological well-being. However, the examination of the relationship between corporate ESG activities and occupational stress is scarce; hence, this study aims to fill this knowledge gap. Methods: In total, 110,351 observations were collected from 41,998 employees regarding occupational stress to reflect employee psychological well-being. The data were derived from 11 corporations in Japan from 2017 to 2019. Data on ESG activities were collected from the MSCI ESG database from 2015 to 2017. The effect of 1-year lagged corporate ESG activities on employee psychological well-being was investigated using a lagged variable linear regression model. Results: Positive and negative relationships were found between corporate environmental activities and occupational stress. Activities that reduce water stress during operation and adopt clean technology were found to benefit employees’ psychological well-being. On the contrary, the program for reducing toxic emissions and waste lowered employees’ occupational stress levels significantly. Regarding corporate social activities, the improvement of job satisfaction or work-life balance was associated with occupational stress. However, corporate governance activities were found to have unfavorable effects on employees’ psychological well-being. Conclusion: The effects of corporate ESG activities on employees’ psychological well-being are found. The managerial implications suggest that caring for employees’ occupational stress during the implementation of environmental activities is necessary, and the adoption of social activities could enhance employees’ psychological well-being. Notably, corporate governance activities are a stressor for employees; top management teams should pay attention to it.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nationwide Survey of Work Environment, Work-Life Balance and Burnout among Psychiatrists in JapanPLOS ONE, 2013
- Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable DevelopmentBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 2012
- A Synthesis of the Evidence for Managing Stress at Work: A Review of the Reviews Reporting on Anxiety, Depression, and AbsenteeismJournal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012
- Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?Journal of Business Ethics, 2011
- Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic reviewOccupational Medicine, 2010
- Relationship between stress and performance in a Japanese nursing organizationInternational Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2009
- The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts From Investments in Corporate Social PerformanceJournal of Management, 2009
- Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidenceOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2008
- Low Workplace Social Capital as a Predictor of Depression: The Finnish Public Sector StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic ManagementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001