Blind ignorance or rational inattention? On the history and future of metabolic considerations for cognitive models
- 2 October 2026
- journal article
- open peer-commentary
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 49, e466
Abstract
We build upon Haueis and Colaço’s account in two ways. First, we argue that the backgrounding of metabolism was a pragmatic response to a data granularity problem faced by traditional cognitive modelers. Then, we suggest that equivalence demonstrations offer a promising pathway for incrementally introducing metabolic considerations into extant modeling practice.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The neural implausibility of the diffusion decision model doesn’t matter for cognitive psychometrics, but the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model is betterPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2024
- Neurocomputational mechanisms of prior-informed perceptual decision-making in humansNature Human Behaviour, 2020
- Joint Models of Neural and Behavioral Data2019
- Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-makingCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2016
- On mimicry among sequential sampling modelsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2015
- Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response timeFrontiers in Psychology, 2014
- Mathematical psychologyWIREs Cognitive Science, 2010