Chest-wall contouring surgery in female-to-male transgender patients: A one-center retrospective analysis of applied surgical techniques and results
Open Access
- 23 June 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 106 (1) , 74-79
Abstract
Background and Aims: Chest-wall contouring surgery is an important part of the gender reassignment process that contributes to strengthening the self-image and facilitating living in the new gender role. Here, we analyze the surgical techniques used in our clinic and report the results. Material and Methods: Female-to-male transgender patients (n = 57) undergoing chest-wall contouring surgery at Tampere University Hospital between January 2003 and April 2015 were enrolled in the study. Breast appearance was evaluated and either a concentric circular approach or a transverse incision technique was used for mastectomy. Patient characteristics and data regarding the technique and postoperative results were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results: In addition to the transgender diagnosis, 40.4% of the patients had another psychiatric diagnosis. For mastectomy, a concentric circular approach was used in 50.9% and a transverse incision approach in 49.1% of the patients. In the transverse incision group, 21.4% of the patients underwent pedicled mammaplasty and 78.6% mastectomy with a free nipple–areola complex graft. Compared with the transverse incision group, breasts were smaller (p < 0.001) and body mass index value was lower in the concentric circular group (p = 0.001). One-third of the patients had complications (hematoma, infection, seroma, fistula, or partial necrosis of nipple–areola complex) and the reoperation rate was 8.8%. Hematoma was the most frequent reason for reoperation. Corrections were required for the scar in 14.0% of the patients, the contour in 28.0%, the areola in 15.8%, and the nipple in 5.3%. Secondary corrections were needed more often in the concentric circular (55.2%) than in the transverse incision group (25.0%; p = 0.031). Conclusions: The larger the breast, poorer the skin quality, and greater the amount of excess skin, the longer the required incision and resulting scar is for mastectomy of female-to-male patients. Hematoma is the most common reason for acute reoperation and secondary corrections are often needed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The case for bilateral mastectomy and male chest contouring for the female-to-male transsexualThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2013
- Subcutaneous Mastectomy in Female‐to‐Male Transsexuals: A Retrospective Cohort‐Analysis of 202 PatientsThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2012
- Female-to-male transgender chest reconstruction: A large consecutive, single-surgeon experienceJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2012
- Hormonal therapy and sex reassignment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of quality of life and psychosocial outcomesClinical Endocrinology, 2010
- A Five-Year Follow-Up Study of Swedish Adults with Gender Identity DisorderArchives of Sexual Behavior, 2009
- Transgender patient satisfaction following reduction mammaplastyJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2009
- Evaluation of surgical procedures for sex reassignment: a systematic reviewJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2009
- Chest-Wall Contouring Surgery in Female-to-Male Transsexuals: A New AlgorithmPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2008
- Female-to-male transgender quality of lifeQuality of Life Research, 2006
- Chest Wall Contouring for Female-to-Male TranssexualsAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1995