Association of Comorbid Conditions and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States

Authors:
  • JBJennifer L. Bragg-Gresham
    Jennifer L. Bragg-Gresham
  • KKKarl G. Koenig
    Karl G. Koenig
  • RWRobert A. Wolfe
    Robert A. Wolfe
  • TATakashi Akiba
    Takashi Akiba
  • VAVittorio E. Andreucci
    Vittorio E. Andreucci
  • ASAkira Saito
    Akira Saito
  • HRHugh C. Rayner
    Hugh C. Rayner
  • KKKiyoshi Kurokawa
    Kiyoshi Kurokawa
  • FPFriedrich K. Port
    Friedrich K. Port
  • PHPhilip J. Held
    Philip J. Held
  • EYEric W. Young
    Eric W. Young
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Mortality rates among hemodialysis patients vary greatly across regions. Representative databases containing extensive profiles of patient characteristics and outcomes are lacking. The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) is a prospective, observational study of representative samples of hemodialysis patients in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States (US) that captures extensive data relating to patient characteristics, prescriptions, laboratory values, practice patterns, and outcomes. This report describes the case-mix features and mortality among 16,720 patients followed up to 5 yr. The crude 1-yr mortality rates were 6.6% in Japan, 15.6% in Europe, and 21.7% in the US. After adjusting for age, gender, race, and 25 comorbid conditions, the relative risk (RR) of mortality was 2.84 (P < 0.0001) for Europe compared with Japan (reference group) and was 3.78 (P < 0.0001) for the US compared with Japan. The adjusted RR of mortality for the US versus Europe was 1.33 (P < 0.0001). For most comorbid diseases, prevalence was highest in the US, where the mean age (60.5 ± 15.5 yr) was also highest. Older age and comorbidities were associated with increased risk of death (except for hypertension, which carried a multivariate RR of mortality of 0.74 [P < 0.0001]). Variability in demographic and comorbid conditions (as identified by dialysis facilities) explains only part of the differences in mortality between dialysis centers, both for comparisons made across continents and within the US. Adjustments for the observed variability will allow study of association between practice patterns and outcomes.